Skip to content

Fig. 01 / Project 04 of 06 / Point cloud

Local grid / 1 : 400

All projects

Kelda Bath HouseReykjavík, 2022

Area
2 100 m²
Year
2022
Structure
Concrete
Status
Complete

Fig. 02 / Drawing set / Plan, section, elevation, axonometric

Fine lines drawn from the model / point cloud on the last tab

Drawn fromthe same model.

Every drawing below comes from the model the building was built and scanned against, with its grid, levels and the dimensions the site team worked to.

1234ABC30 00020 00012 000Pool A / 12 × 8Pool BPlungeChangingRoof light overN010 mSCALE 1:250

Fig. 03 / Scan vs design / As built against as drawn

Grey under 3 mm / blue over 8 mm

The building,against its drawing.

Drag the handle to compare the design with the latest scan. Each point is coloured by how far the built surface sits from the drawn one.

6 00012 000−1.80−1.40+0.00+6.00+7.20Pool APool BRoof lightEdge of pool B05 mSCALE 1:200DESIGNAS BUILT

6.5 mm / Edge of pool B, north wall

Fig. 04 / Construction / Survey to handover

All milestones complete

Construction timeline

  1. Survey / Done
  2. Foundations / Done
  3. Structure / Done
  4. Envelope / Done
  5. Handover / Done

Oct 2019 to May 2022 / 31 months

Fig. 05 / Credits / Team

Everyone who built it

Credits

Client
Kelda Baths
Structure
Hraun Structural
Services
Gufa Building Services
Contractor
Vík Construction
Scan imagery
Norrvik

Fig. 06 / Narrative / What the model found

About 200 words

About the project

Client
Kelda Baths
Location
Reykjavík / Iceland
Sensors
96

Kelda is a public bath house on the harbour edge in Reykjavík, with three geothermal pools cast in situ in low-carbon concrete. The building steps down toward the water in three terraces, so every pool keeps its view across the bay, and the changing rooms sit in a thick concrete volume on the upper terrace that shelters the pools from the north wind.

A bath house is a moisture problem dressed as architecture. Warm pool water, cold sea air and concrete that takes years to dry make condensation and slow damage the main long-term risks, so we embedded moisture probes in the slabs and walls during the pour and tied the ventilation to them from the first day of operation. Pool hall humidity is held at 62 percent, within two percent of the design value, and the concrete has dried to 3.1 percent moisture by mass. Four years of data now set the maintenance plan for the pool linings instead of a fixed schedule.

Fig. 07 / Energy / 24 months monitored

kWh per m² per month / dashed line is the target

Energy use,month by month.

Last 12 months
96 kWh/m²
Monthly target
8.3 kWh/m²
Months at or under target
13 / 24
Embodied carbon
402 kgCO2e/m²
Monitored energy use for Kelda Bath House, kWh per square metre per month
PeriodMeasured
Oct 248.4 kWh/m²
Nov 249.2 kWh/m²
Dec 249.8 kWh/m²
Jan 259.9 kWh/m²
Feb 259.7 kWh/m²
Mar 259.1 kWh/m²
Apr 258.3 kWh/m²
May 257.5 kWh/m²
Jun 256.9 kWh/m²
Jul 256.7 kWh/m²
Aug 256.9 kWh/m²
Sep 257.6 kWh/m²
Oct 258 kWh/m²
Nov 258.8 kWh/m²
Dec 259.4 kWh/m²
Jan 269.4 kWh/m²
Feb 269.3 kWh/m²
Mar 268.8 kWh/m²
Apr 268 kWh/m²
May 267.2 kWh/m²
Jun 266.7 kWh/m²
Jul 266.4 kWh/m²
Aug 266.6 kWh/m²
Sep 267.4 kWh/m²
Monthly energy use per square metre of floor area, Oct 24 to Sep 26. The dashed blue line is the design target.

Fig. 08 / Materials / Structural mass

Share by weight, as built

Share of structural mass by material, Kelda Bath House
MaterialShare
Concrete71%
Glass9%
Timber8%
Steel7%
Other5%

Fig. 09 / Lessons learned / Carried into the next model

03 entries

  1. L01Lesson learnedEmbed moisture probes in the pour. Retrofitting them means drilling the waterproofing.
  2. L02Lesson learnedConcrete dried twice as slowly on the sea side, so the linings were sequenced to match.
  3. L03Lesson learnedHumidity data set the maintenance plan. The fixed schedule would have relined too early.
Made with Modulify