Fig. 01 / Project 04 of 06 / Point cloud
Local grid / 1 : 400
Kelda Bath HouseReykjavík, 2022
- Area
- 2 100 m²
- Year
- 2022
- Structure
- Concrete
- Status
- Complete
Fig. 02 / Drawing set / Plan, section, elevation, axonometric
Fine lines drawn from the model / point cloud on the last tab
Drawn fromthe same model.
Every drawing below comes from the model the building was built and scanned against, with its grid, levels and the dimensions the site team worked to.
Fig. 03 / Scan vs design / As built against as drawn
Grey under 3 mm / blue over 8 mm
The building,against its drawing.
Drag the handle to compare the design with the latest scan. Each point is coloured by how far the built surface sits from the drawn one.
6.5 mm / Edge of pool B, north wall
Fig. 04 / Construction / Survey to handover
All milestones complete
Construction timeline
- Survey / Done
- Foundations / Done
- Structure / Done
- Envelope / Done
- Handover / Done
- Survey
- Foundations
- Structure
- Envelope
- Handover
Oct 2019 to May 2022 / 31 months
Fig. 05 / Credits / Team
Everyone who built it
Credits
- Client
- Kelda Baths
- Structure
- Hraun Structural
- Services
- Gufa Building Services
- Contractor
- Vík Construction
- Scan imagery
- Norrvik
Fig. 06 / Narrative / What the model found
About 200 words
About the project
- Client
- Kelda Baths
- Location
- Reykjavík / Iceland
- Sensors
- 96
Kelda is a public bath house on the harbour edge in Reykjavík, with three geothermal pools cast in situ in low-carbon concrete. The building steps down toward the water in three terraces, so every pool keeps its view across the bay, and the changing rooms sit in a thick concrete volume on the upper terrace that shelters the pools from the north wind.
A bath house is a moisture problem dressed as architecture. Warm pool water, cold sea air and concrete that takes years to dry make condensation and slow damage the main long-term risks, so we embedded moisture probes in the slabs and walls during the pour and tied the ventilation to them from the first day of operation. Pool hall humidity is held at 62 percent, within two percent of the design value, and the concrete has dried to 3.1 percent moisture by mass. Four years of data now set the maintenance plan for the pool linings instead of a fixed schedule.
Fig. 07 / Energy / 24 months monitored
kWh per m² per month / dashed line is the target
Energy use,month by month.
- Last 12 months
- 96 kWh/m²
- Monthly target
- 8.3 kWh/m²
- Months at or under target
- 13 / 24
- Embodied carbon
- 402 kgCO2e/m²
| Period | Measured |
|---|---|
| Oct 24 | 8.4 kWh/m² |
| Nov 24 | 9.2 kWh/m² |
| Dec 24 | 9.8 kWh/m² |
| Jan 25 | 9.9 kWh/m² |
| Feb 25 | 9.7 kWh/m² |
| Mar 25 | 9.1 kWh/m² |
| Apr 25 | 8.3 kWh/m² |
| May 25 | 7.5 kWh/m² |
| Jun 25 | 6.9 kWh/m² |
| Jul 25 | 6.7 kWh/m² |
| Aug 25 | 6.9 kWh/m² |
| Sep 25 | 7.6 kWh/m² |
| Oct 25 | 8 kWh/m² |
| Nov 25 | 8.8 kWh/m² |
| Dec 25 | 9.4 kWh/m² |
| Jan 26 | 9.4 kWh/m² |
| Feb 26 | 9.3 kWh/m² |
| Mar 26 | 8.8 kWh/m² |
| Apr 26 | 8 kWh/m² |
| May 26 | 7.2 kWh/m² |
| Jun 26 | 6.7 kWh/m² |
| Jul 26 | 6.4 kWh/m² |
| Aug 26 | 6.6 kWh/m² |
| Sep 26 | 7.4 kWh/m² |
Fig. 08 / Materials / Structural mass
Share by weight, as built
| Material | Share |
|---|---|
| Concrete | 71% |
| Glass | 9% |
| Timber | 8% |
| Steel | 7% |
| Other | 5% |
Fig. 09 / Lessons learned / Carried into the next model
03 entries
- L01Lesson learnedEmbed moisture probes in the pour. Retrofitting them means drilling the waterproofing.
- L02Lesson learnedConcrete dried twice as slowly on the sea side, so the linings were sequenced to match.
- L03Lesson learnedHumidity data set the maintenance plan. The fixed schedule would have relined too early.