Fig. 01 / Project 01 of 06 / Point cloud
Local grid / 1 : 400
Hallmark LibraryUmeå, 2024
- Area
- 9 400 m²
- Year
- 2024
- Structure
- Timber
- Status
- Complete
Fig. 02 / Drawing set / Plan, section, elevation, axonometric
Fine lines drawn from the model / point cloud on the last tab
Drawn fromthe same model.
Every drawing below comes from the model the building was built and scanned against, with its grid, levels and the dimensions the site team worked to.
Fig. 03 / Scan vs design / As built against as drawn
Grey under 3 mm / blue over 8 mm
The building,against its drawing.
Drag the handle to compare the design with the latest scan. Each point is coloured by how far the built surface sits from the drawn one.
11 mm / Mezzanine bay C3, corrected before opening
Fig. 04 / Construction / Survey to handover
All milestones complete
Construction timeline
- Survey / Done
- Foundations / Done
- Structure / Done
- Envelope / Done
- Handover / Done
- Survey
- Foundations
- Structure
- Envelope
- Handover
Mar 2021 to Sep 2024 / 42 months
Fig. 05 / Credits / Team
Everyone who built it
Credits
- Client
- Umeå Library Foundation
- Structure
- Lindqvist Timber Engineering
- Services
- Nordvärme Installation
- Contractor
- Bjerke Bygg
- Scan imagery
- Norrvik
Fig. 06 / Narrative / What the model found
About 200 words
About the project
- Client
- Umeå Library Foundation
- Location
- Umeå / Sweden
- Sensors
- 412
Hallmark Library is a cross-laminated timber library on the bank of the Ume River, three storeys under a stepped roof that pulls northern light deep into the reading rooms. It replaces a 1970s branch library on the same plot and serves a city where, for half the year, the reading room is also a warm public living room. The structure is left exposed inside, so every column, beam and panel can be read, measured and, when the time comes, replaced or reused.
We scanned the site before demolition and again at every structural stage, 318 million points in all. Two weeks before the screed was due, the scan of the mezzanine showed one bay sitting 11 millimetres below the model, more than the floor finish could hide. The cause was a single support bracket fixed one hole too low. It was corrected, the bay was rescanned the same afternoon and the floor went down level, a fortnight before opening rather than a year after it. Since then 412 sensors report deflection, facade moisture and indoor climate to the model every fifteen minutes.
Fig. 07 / Energy / 24 months monitored
kWh per m² per month / dashed line is the target
Energy use,month by month.
- Last 12 months
- 58 kWh/m²
- Monthly target
- 5.0 kWh/m²
- Months at or under target
- 14 / 24
- Embodied carbon
- 212 kgCO2e/m²
| Period | Measured |
|---|---|
| Oct 24 | 5 kWh/m² |
| Nov 24 | 6.6 kWh/m² |
| Dec 24 | 7.9 kWh/m² |
| Jan 25 | 8.3 kWh/m² |
| Feb 25 | 7.7 kWh/m² |
| Mar 25 | 6.4 kWh/m² |
| Apr 25 | 4.8 kWh/m² |
| May 25 | 3.8 kWh/m² |
| Jun 25 | 2.9 kWh/m² |
| Jul 25 | 2.6 kWh/m² |
| Aug 25 | 2.8 kWh/m² |
| Sep 25 | 3.7 kWh/m² |
| Oct 25 | 4.6 kWh/m² |
| Nov 25 | 6.2 kWh/m² |
| Dec 25 | 7.3 kWh/m² |
| Jan 26 | 7.7 kWh/m² |
| Feb 26 | 7 kWh/m² |
| Mar 26 | 6 kWh/m² |
| Apr 26 | 4.6 kWh/m² |
| May 26 | 3.4 kWh/m² |
| Jun 26 | 2.7 kWh/m² |
| Jul 26 | 2.5 kWh/m² |
| Aug 26 | 2.6 kWh/m² |
| Sep 26 | 3.4 kWh/m² |
Fig. 08 / Materials / Structural mass
Share by weight, as built
| Material | Share |
|---|---|
| Timber | 62% |
| Concrete | 18% |
| Glass | 11% |
| Steel | 5% |
| Other | 4% |
Fig. 09 / Lessons learned / Carried into the next model
03 entries
- L01Lesson learnedScan every slab before the screed goes down, not after the floor is finished.
- L02Lesson learnedThe CLT panels arrived within 3 mm. The tolerance was lost at a single support bracket.
- L03Lesson learnedA bay rescanned in one afternoon cost less than a single day of delayed opening.