Fig. 01 / Project 02 of 06 / Point cloud
Local grid / 1 : 400
Casa MaresLisbon, 2023
- Area
- 7 800 m²
- Year
- 2023
- Structure
- Masonry and timber
- Status
- Complete
Fig. 02 / Drawing set / Plan, section, elevation, axonometric
Fine lines drawn from the model / point cloud on the last tab
Drawn fromthe same model.
Every drawing below comes from the model the building was built and scanned against, with its grid, levels and the dimensions the site team worked to.
Fig. 03 / Scan vs design / As built against as drawn
Grey under 3 mm / blue over 8 mm
The building,against its drawing.
Drag the handle to compare the design with the latest scan. Each point is coloured by how far the built surface sits from the drawn one.
9 mm / Fin line on level 4, west facade
Fig. 04 / Construction / Survey to handover
All milestones complete
Construction timeline
- Survey / Done
- Foundations / Done
- Structure / Done
- Envelope / Done
- Handover / Done
- Survey
- Foundations
- Structure
- Envelope
- Handover
Sep 2020 to Jun 2023 / 33 months
Fig. 05 / Credits / Team
Everyone who built it
Credits
- Client
- Cooperativa Habitacional Mares
- Structure
- Atlântico Estruturas
- Services
- Fluxo Engenharia
- Contractor
- Construções Ribeiro
- Scan imagery
- Norrvik
Fig. 06 / Narrative / What the model found
About 200 words
About the project
- Client
- Cooperativa Habitacional Mares
- Location
- Lisbon / Portugal
- Sensors
- 192
Casa Mares is sixty-four homes for a housing cooperative in Marvila, in eastern Lisbon, built as a masonry ground floor with seven timber floors above. The long facades face east and west, which in Lisbon means the low afternoon sun is the main thermal load, and the first design put most living rooms on the west side to catch the evening light over the river.
Before construction we ran the thermal model against a full year of measured Lisbon weather instead of a standard design day. It showed the west living rooms overheating on most summer afternoons. Deep vertical fins, 900 millimetres from the glass and angled ten degrees to the south, cut the modelled west facade heat gain by 31 percent without losing the view. Since move-in every home has carried its own meters for heat, daylight and humidity, and a fourteen-day audit compares them with the thermal twin. Two thermal bridges found at balcony edges in the first summer were sealed within a month.
Fig. 07 / Energy / 24 months monitored
kWh per m² per month / dashed line is the target
Energy use,month by month.
- Last 12 months
- 49 kWh/m²
- Monthly target
- 4.2 kWh/m²
- Months at or under target
- 14 / 24
- Embodied carbon
- 268 kgCO2e/m²
| Period | Measured |
|---|---|
| Oct 24 | 3.7 kWh/m² |
| Nov 24 | 4.5 kWh/m² |
| Dec 24 | 5.6 kWh/m² |
| Jan 25 | 6 kWh/m² |
| Feb 25 | 5.3 kWh/m² |
| Mar 25 | 4.2 kWh/m² |
| Apr 25 | 3.7 kWh/m² |
| May 25 | 3.5 kWh/m² |
| Jun 25 | 4 kWh/m² |
| Jul 25 | 4.7 kWh/m² |
| Aug 25 | 5 kWh/m² |
| Sep 25 | 3.8 kWh/m² |
| Oct 25 | 3.3 kWh/m² |
| Nov 25 | 4.1 kWh/m² |
| Dec 25 | 5.1 kWh/m² |
| Jan 26 | 5.3 kWh/m² |
| Feb 26 | 5 kWh/m² |
| Mar 26 | 4 kWh/m² |
| Apr 26 | 3.5 kWh/m² |
| May 26 | 3.2 kWh/m² |
| Jun 26 | 3.6 kWh/m² |
| Jul 26 | 4.1 kWh/m² |
| Aug 26 | 4.3 kWh/m² |
| Sep 26 | 3.5 kWh/m² |
Fig. 08 / Materials / Structural mass
Share by weight, as built
| Material | Share |
|---|---|
| Timber | 38% |
| Masonry | 31% |
| Concrete | 14% |
| Glass | 10% |
| Other | 7% |
Fig. 09 / Lessons learned / Carried into the next model
03 entries
- L01Lesson learnedModel a measured weather year, not a design day. The overheating hid in the afternoons.
- L02Lesson learnedA fixed fin outperformed every blind schedule we simulated for the west homes.
- L03Lesson learnedMeters in every home turned the thermal twin from a drawing into an audit.